[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <adave1oqslr.fsf@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 16:33:04 -0700
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
To: Ken Moffat <zarniwhoop@...world.com>
Cc: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: GIT bisection range errors
> > $ git checkout -b rc v2.6.26-rc1
> > $ git bisect start
> > $ git bisect bad
> > $ git bisect good v2.6.25
> >
> > Yet, during this I'm finding myself at 2.6.25-rc6 and 2.6.25-rc8
> > as the last two results (both good...).
> I reported a similar thing at the beginning of April
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/2/390 - 2.6.25-rc1 bad, 2.6.24 good, git
> dropped me back at 2.6.24-rc4 (again, according to the top level
> Makefile).
This is normal and expected, due to the distributed nature of git and
the fact that git-bisect operates on the full topology of history and
not just a linear sequence of commits.
Imagine history like:
A---B---C---D
\ /
\ /
\ /
E---F
where B is good and D is bad. Now, when you bisect, there is no way to
know whether, say, E is good or bad and hence the bisect process may
present E as a tree to try.
Now, if B is the 2.6.25 release, then since E branched off before B, it
will have a Makefile that says 2.6.25-rcX. Which is exactly the
behavior you are seeing.
In short, everything looks fine and is behaving as expected.
- R.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists