[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4823928D.7080907@goop.org>
Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 00:53:49 +0100
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...source.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] call_usermodehelper_setup() should use GFP_KERNEL
KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> UMH_WAIT_EXEC and UMH_WAIT_PROC mean wait on finish of exec or process exit.
> I can't imagine situation that exec is waitable *and* allocate isn't waitable.
>
Yeah, that's why I was asking about UMH_NO_WAIT, where the caller may
not want to wait, but the context would allow the allocation to block if
necessary.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists