[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84144f020805072230g2a619d65x8e3bb1fbf9d130d8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 08:30:20 +0300
From: "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: "Andrea Arcangeli" <andrea@...ranet.com>
Cc: "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Christoph Lameter" <clameter@....com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, steiner@....com,
holt@....com, npiggin@...e.de, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, kanojsarcar@...oo.com,
rdreier@...co.com, swise@...ngridcomputing.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, avi@...ranet.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
general@...ts.openfabrics.org, hugh@...itas.com,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, aliguori@...ibm.com, chrisw@...hat.com,
marcelo@...ck.org, dada1@...mosbay.com, paulmck@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08 of 11] anon-vma-rwsem
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi> wrote:
> You might want to read carefully what Linus wrote:
>
> > The one that already has a 4 byte padding thing on x86-64 just after the
> > spinlock? And that on 32-bit x86 (with less than 256 CPU's) would have two
> > bytes of padding if we didn't just make the spinlock type unconditionally
> > 32 bits rather than the 16 bits we actually _use_?
>
> So you need to add the flag _after_ ->lock and _before_ ->head....
Oh should have taken my morning coffee first, before ->lock works
obviously as well.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists