[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1210319983.5250.4.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 09:59:43 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: sysbench+mysql(oltp, readonly) 30% regression with 2.6.26-rc1
On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 09:50 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 09:32 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 08:51 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > > > -rc1. Do you have the fix below applied?
> > > > >
> > > > > Oooh - good catch, that seems to be a post -rc1 merge.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes this is required.
> > >
> > > > With below patch+previous_fix_weight_calc, the result is improved, but is still
> > > > about 10% worse than the one of pure 2.6.26-rc1.
> > > > Number of threads: 16
> > > > read/write requests: 6104336 (50867.11 per sec.)
> > > >
> > >
> > > So puzzling - could you try -git + fix_weight_calc, as I think that is
> > > what Mike tested and proved good on his Quad.
> >
> > If he still has group scheduling enabled, my box agrees that there's a
> > regression. I got mysql running, and tested with group scheduling both
> > enabled and disabled, results attached. (for some reason, I can only
> > test up to 64 threads with mysql though)
>
> Hm, ok. Does the patch at hand improve or regress the group config for
> you?
Oh, you want me to revert it and retest group?
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists