[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4824673B.1030503@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 19:01:15 +0400
From: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@...e.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, toralf.foerster@....de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Subject: Re: build issue #380 for v2.6.26-rc1-279-g28a4acb : mach-voyager:
multiple definition of `phys_cpu_present_map'
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com> wrote:
>
>>>> /* Bitmask of CPUs present in the system - exported by i386_syms.c, used
>>>> * by scheduler but indexed physically */
>>>> -cpumask_t phys_cpu_present_map = CPU_MASK_NONE;
>>>> +static cpumask_t phys_cpu_present_map = CPU_MASK_NONE;
>>> i've got the one below queued up but it's stalled as it could easily be
>>> wrong and there's no ack from James yet and there's been discussion back
>>> and forth. James, what do you suggest?
>
>> I already told you that this was incorrect. This is what I sent as
>> the replacement on 28 April and I didn't hear back from you.
>>
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120941111400620
>
> ok - picked it up for testing - could you please send a signoff line as
> well?
>
> Alexey, you moved those SMP variables, do you agree with the patch from
> James? (it looks good to me)
Yes, they look good to me as well.
Alex.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists