[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080509181106.GF1907@fieldses.org>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 14:11:06 -0400
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/9] lockd: dont return EAGAIN from blocking lock
request
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 02:41:08PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
>
> EAGAIN does not make sense as a return value from a blocking lock
But nlm_stat_to_errno() is called in the non-blocking case too, right?
What am I missing?
--b.
> request, the lock should be retried by the kernel until either it is
> successful or fails permanently.
>
> Looking at the server side NLM_LCK_DENIED means a permanent error in
> this case, so just turn this into an ENOLCK.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
> CC: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
> CC: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
> ---
> fs/lockd/clntproc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/fs/lockd/clntproc.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/lockd/clntproc.c 2008-05-09 14:04:16.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6/fs/lockd/clntproc.c 2008-05-09 14:04:46.000000000 +0200
> @@ -808,7 +808,7 @@ nlm_stat_to_errno(__be32 status)
> case NLM_LCK_GRANTED:
> return 0;
> case NLM_LCK_DENIED:
> - return -EAGAIN;
> + return -ENOLCK;
> case NLM_LCK_DENIED_NOLOCKS:
> case NLM_LCK_DENIED_GRACE_PERIOD:
> return -ENOLCK;
>
> --
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists