[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4824AD3C.3070506@grupopie.com>
Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 20:59:56 +0100
From: Paulo Marques <pmarques@...popie.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: /proc/kallsyms broken in 2.6.26-rc1-git6
Andi Kleen wrote:
>>> ffffffff80337043 u idr_pre_get [i2c_core]
>>> ffffc2000007573e ? DW.sched.h.920090ff.56 [i2c_core]
>> Are you compiling with CONFIG_KALLSYMS_ALL?
>
> Yep.
>
> CONFIG_KALLSYMS=y
> CONFIG_KALLSYMS_ALL=y
> # CONFIG_KALLSYMS_EXTRA_PASS is not set
>
>> If you are, kallsyms will store all the output of "nm -n vmlinux" no
>> matter what section the symbol belongs to...
>
> Yes and? Surely that's not correct?
That's not for me to judge, but I believe it has always been like that.
I just wanted to understand if you noticed a change in behavior (which
is probably a bug) or if it has always been like that but you just
noticed how ugly it is.
Maybe you also have some debug or markers configuration or something
that is generating extra symbols to a special section that is just
making the problem look worse now.
Anyway, I can change the way kallsyms works, but that has to be done
with some care because there are some userspace tools that read
/proc/kallsyms and we don't want to break those. A proper testing period
through -mm should take care of that, though.
--
Paulo Marques - www.grupopie.com
"All generalizations are false."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists