lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080509035306.GA10978@khazad-dum.debian.net>
Date:	Fri, 9 May 2008 00:53:06 -0300
From:	Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
To:	Karol Lewandowski <lmctlx@...il.com>
Cc:	ibm-acpi-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ibm-acpi-devel] BUG: linux-2.6.26-rc1 oops at
	thinkpad_acpi:led_set_status

On Fri, 09 May 2008, Karol Lewandowski wrote:
> On my Thinkpad T21 executing:

Please send me by private email the acpidump and dmidecode information
for your ThinkPad, I don't have any for the T21.  Feel free to
XXXXXX-out the UUID and serial number of your T21 in the dmidecode
output.

The machine was clean after a boot, correct? (no sleeps or other
known-to-be-busted-in-2.6.26 operations before the OOPS?)

Assuming the comments on the LED code from the first ibm-acpi maintainer
are correct, the T20-T22 use the same LED interface, the "LED_OLD"
ibm-acpi codepath.  That codepath is indeed NOT tested often, as I don't
have a way to do so.  Bugs there wouldn't surprise me too much.

If you try it using the sysfs led class, do you get the same OOPS? (I
expect you to. If you don't, I *need* to know this).

Is it always a problem with the last led (number 7), or other leds also
cause the OOPS?

Also, please try the patch below, and send me the debug output it will
generate.

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh

diff --git a/drivers/misc/thinkpad_acpi.c b/drivers/misc/thinkpad_acpi.c
index 3f28f6e..392c800 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/thinkpad_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/thinkpad_acpi.c
@@ -3867,6 +3867,9 @@ static int led_set_status(unsigned int led, enum led_status_t ledstatus)
 
 	int rc = 0;
 
+	printk(TPACPI_ERR "debug: led %u, status %u, mode %u\n",
+		led, ledstatus, led_supported);
+
 	switch (led_supported) {
 	case TPACPI_LED_570:
 			/* 570 */
@@ -3878,13 +3881,22 @@ static int led_set_status(unsigned int led, enum led_status_t ledstatus)
 	case TPACPI_LED_OLD:
 			/* 600e/x, 770e, 770x, A21e, A2xm/p, T20-22, X20 */
 			led = 1 << led;
+			printk(TPACPI_ERR "debug: led is now 0x%0X\n", led);
+			printk(TPACPI_ERR "debug: will write A=0x%0X, B=0x%0X\n",
+				led * led_exp_hlbl[ledstatus],
+				led * led_exp_hlcl[ledstatus]);
+
 			rc = ec_write(TPACPI_LED_EC_HLMS, led);
 			if (rc >= 0)
 				rc = ec_write(TPACPI_LED_EC_HLBL,
 					      led * led_exp_hlbl[ledstatus]);
+			else
+				printk(TPACPI_ERR "debug: kaboom1 %d\n", rc);
 			if (rc >= 0)
 				rc = ec_write(TPACPI_LED_EC_HLCL,
 					      led * led_exp_hlcl[ledstatus]);
+			if (rc)
+				printk(TPACPI_ERR "debug: kaboom2 %d\n", rc);
 			break;
 	case TPACPI_LED_NEW:
 			/* all others */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ