[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080509052049.GA2161@linux-sh.org>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 14:20:49 +0900
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
To: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, bunk@...nel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"William L. Irwin" <wli@...omorphy.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: define default cpu_to_node
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 04:02:39PM -0700, Mike Travis wrote:
> * Some architectures have CONFIG_NUMA=y but do not define a
> default cpu_to_node macro. This provides the default in
> asm-generic/topology.h but it relies on the fact that
> cpu_to_node is a defined macro (and not an inline function).
>
NACK.. This isn't going to work anyways, cpu_to_node() is just where the
first build error occurs. If you do this, then parent_node() is the next
one to blow up, node_to_cpumask() after that, etc, etc. For now I've just
stubbed the asm-generic/topology.h definitions in to asm-sh/topology.h.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists