lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080510190759.GA16275@lst.de>
Date:	Sat, 10 May 2008 21:07:59 +0200
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
Cc:	Carl Love <cel@...ibm.com>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	oprofile-list <oprofile-list@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	cbe-oss-dev@...abs.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH] Updated: Reworked Cell OProfile: SPU	mutex lock fix

> > +	/* Ignoring the return value from the unregister
> > +	 * call.  A failed return value simply says there
> > +	 * was no registered event.  Hence there will not
> > +	 * be any calls to process a switch event that
> > +	 * could cause a problem.
> > +	 */
> > +	spu_switch_event_unregister(&spu_active);
> 
> Better to use this here, to show the return value is ignored:
> 
>        (void)spu_switch_event_unregister(...)

Actually Linux style is to not add those casts.  But I don't think we
all the notifier_chain_unregister funtion should return error at all,
we should probably fix that up in the core code.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ