[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6101e8c40805101333l582aecebr3dd49d5d30f9efc@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 22:33:09 +0200
From: "Oliver Pinter" <oliver.pntr@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Aurelien Jarno" <aurelien@...el32.net>
Subject: [2.6.24] [Q] x86: clear DF before calling signal handler II.
Hi LKML!
Im mainline e40cd10ccff3d9fbffd57b93780bee4b7b9bff51 commit
( x86: clear DF before calling signal handler ) changed the ~TF_MASK and
~X86_EFLAGS_TF to ~(~X86_EFLAGS_TF | ~X86_EFLAGS_DF).
include/asm-x86/signal.h:
-------------------------->
248 #define ptrace_signal_deliver(regs, cookie) \
249 do { \
250 if (current->ptrace & PT_DTRACE) { \
251 current->ptrace &= ~PT_DTRACE; \
252 (regs)->eflags &= ~TF_MASK; \ <-----------
253 } \
254 } while (0)
<-------------------------
Signed-off-by: Oliver Pinter <oliver.pntr@...il.com>
the question:
in this file the change is unnecessary or forgotted?
NO COMPILE TESTED!
---
diff --git a/include/asm-x86/signal.h b/include/asm-x86/signal.h
index 987a422..71effa1 100644
--- a/include/asm-x86/signal.h
+++ b/include/asm-x86/signal.h
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ struct pt_regs;
do { \
if (current->ptrace & PT_DTRACE) { \
current->ptrace &= ~PT_DTRACE; \
- (regs)->eflags &= ~TF_MASK; \
+ (regs)->eflags &= ~(TF_MASK | X86_EFLAGS_DF); \
} \
} while (0)
--
Thanks,
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists