[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805100202140.3197@apollo.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 02:02:51 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: andreas.herrmann3@....com, mingo@...e.hu, hpa@...or.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: enable hpet=force for AMD SB400
On Fri, 9 May 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 10 May 2008 01:42:30 +0200 (CEST)
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 9 May 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Fri, 9 May 2008 11:49:11 +0200
> > > Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > x86: enable hpet=force for ATI SB400
> > >
> > > Sigh.
> > >
> > > > Add quirk to allow forced usage of HPET on ATI SB400.
> > > > I stumbled over machines where HPET is enabled but not reported
> > > > by BIOS.
> > >
> > > Is there no way in which we can probe for or identify this condition,
> > > rather than hoping that the user will find out about this boot option?
> >
> > I'd love to have a sane solution for that, but looking at the rate of
> > HPET wreckage since we increased the usage of HPET I'm happy to have
> > this as an opt in thingy.
> >
>
> Well we don't have to auto-enable the hpet. Simply adding a loud "you
> should try the hpet=force option" printk would help a lot of people.
Fair enough. I look into that.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists