[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080510143433.GD3148@hacking>
Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 22:34:33 +0800
From: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
toralf.foerster@....de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@...e.de>
Subject: Re: build issue #380 for v2.6.26-rc1-279-g28a4acb : mach-voyager:
multiple definition of `phys_cpu_present_map'
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 09:01:48AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
>
>OK, so these symbols are required on visws as well. So that makes the
>gating config symbol X86_LOCAL_APIC.
>
>Could you run this through the same config to verify; thanks!
>
>James
>
>---
>
>From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
>Subject: [VOYAGER] fix duplicate phys_cpu_present_map symbol
>
>The phys_cpu_present_map is an expected symbol in the SMP harness.
>Unfortunately, x86 recently moved this and a few others to
>kernel/setup.c where it doesn't quite work because voyager has to
>define its own. Use CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC to isolate these
>definitions and fix up another area in setup.c where CONFIG_X86_SMP
>should be used instead of CONFIG_SMP.
>
Hmmm, I rechecked the files used 'phys_cpu_present_map'.
$ grep -nr "mpspec.h" arch/x86/ | cut -d: -f 1 | xargs grep "phys_cpu_present_map" | cut -d: -f 1 | uniq
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
arch/x86/kernel/apic_64.c
arch/x86/kernel/apic_32.c
And in Makefile:
obj-$(CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC) += apic_$(BITS).o nmi_$(BITS).o
So your patch looks correct!
Thanks.
Cong
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists