linux-kernel - Re: [2.6 patch] kernel/sched*: optimize inlining

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2c0942db0805111022p5c977cdw75aaf10caed7ee7e@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 11 May 2008 10:22:42 -0700
From:	"Ray Lee" <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>
To:	"Adrian Bunk" <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc:	"Andreas Mohr" <andi@...as.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] kernel/sched*: optimize inlining

On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 5:52 AM, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 01:18:20PM +0200, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> If you didn't complain when "x86: add optimized inlining" got into
> Linus' tree you can't validly complain about my patch.

You would fail a course in logic. Please read up on "The fallacy of
division" (aka Fallacy of decomposition), and try your argument again.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/