[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080511200842.GN19058@joi>
Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 22:08:45 +0200
From: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@...il.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...tin.ibm.com>,
jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH] jfs: 0 is not valid errno value
... so return NULL from jfs_lookup
Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@...il.com>
Cc: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...tin.ibm.com>
Cc: jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
---
is it ok to return NULL from this function?
compile tested only
---
fs/jfs/namei.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/jfs/namei.c b/fs/jfs/namei.c
--- a/fs/jfs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/jfs/namei.c
@@ -1455,7 +1455,7 @@ static struct dentry *jfs_lookup(struct inode *dip, struct dentry *dentry, struc
free_UCSname(&key);
if (rc == -ENOENT) {
d_add(dentry, NULL);
- return ERR_PTR(0);
+ return NULL;
} else if (rc) {
jfs_err("jfs_lookup: dtSearch returned %d", rc);
return ERR_PTR(rc);
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists