[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19f34abd0805110609lf3180dm3b1078e373983ad7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 15:09:28 +0200
From: "Vegard Nossum" <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
To: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Error in save_stack_trace() on x86_64?
Hi,
I am having a problem with v2.6.26-rc1 on x86_64. It seems that
save_stack_trace() is not able to follow page fault boundaries, since
all my saved traces look like this:
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8039b004>] [<ffffffff8039b004>] add_uevent_var+0xb4/0x160
...
[<ffffffff80221f97>] kmemcheck_read+0x127/0x1e0
[<ffffffff80222269>] kmemcheck_access+0x179/0x1d0
[<ffffffff8022231f>] kmemcheck_fault+0x5f/0x80
[<ffffffff8061cd1e>] do_page_fault+0x4de/0x8d0
[<ffffffff8061a7d9>] error_exit+0x0/0x51
[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
I have this in my .config:
CONFIG_STACKTRACE_SUPPORT=y
CONFIG_STACKTRACE=y
...
CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y
...
CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO=y
On 32-bit, I am able to see the calls leading up to the page fault as
well. Did I miss something here?
Vegard
--
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists