linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Make for_each_cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080511091403.a75f5b78.pj@sgi.com>
Date:	Sun, 11 May 2008 09:14:03 -0500
From:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To:	Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...lshack.com>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	heukelum@...tmail.fm, travis@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make for_each_cpu_mask a bit smaller

Alexander wrote:
> This patch
> changes for_each_cpu_mask to use only one function: a newly
> introduced find_next_cpu.

I believe that it's for_each_cpu_mask which is newly introduced,
not find_next_cpu ... just a typo, granted.

Any chance that you could make the same change to nodemask.h?
Where practical, I like to keep cpumask.h and nodemask.h the same.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.940.382.4214
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/