[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84144f020805120323x38e5c657v97e4aec8d334de6f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 13:23:28 +0300
From: "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: "Andi Kleen" <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: "KOSAKI Motohiro" <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
"Rik van Riel" <riel@...hat.com>,
"Christoph Lameter" <clameter@....com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
"Mel Gorman" <mel@...net.ie>, mpm@...enic.com,
"Matthew Wilcox" <matthew@....cx>,
"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 21/21] slab defrag: Obsolete SLAB
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 1:08 PM, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> > Christoph fixed a tbench regression that was in the same ballpark as
> > the TPC regression reported by Matthew which is why we've asked the
> > Intel folks to re-test. But yeah, we're working on it.
>
> What are your plans to fix it?
I don't have a reproducable test and my boxes are so tiny the issues
probably won't show up anyway. So all I can do at this point is to
make sure Matthew et al can easily re-test whenever we fix some other
regression that potentially affects his workload.
I only recently started tracking this issue so I have no idea where
we're at with this. Christoph? Matthew?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists