[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080512.121019.183038803.ryov@valinux.co.jp>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 12:10:19 +0900 (JST)
From: Ryo Tsuruta <ryov@...inux.co.jp>
To: s-uchida@...jp.nec.com
Cc: vtaras@...nvz.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, axboe@...nel.dk,
tom-sugawara@...jp.nec.com, m-takahashi@...jp.nec.com,
devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][v2][patch 0/12][CFQ-cgroup]Yet another I/O bandwidth
controlling subsystem for CGroups based on CFQ
Hi, Uchida-san,
Thanks for your comments.
> In the test #2 and #3, did you use direct write?
> I guess you have used the non-direct write I/O (using cache).
Yes, I did. I used direct write in all tests.
I would appreciate it if you would try a test like I did.
--
Ryo Tsuruta <ryov@...inux.co.jp>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists