[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0805122046260.20369@ask.diku.dk>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 20:48:15 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
Cc: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] drivers/net: remove null pointer dereference
On Mon, 12 May 2008, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Julia Lawall wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 May 2008, Francois Romieu wrote:
> >
> > > Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk> :
> > > [...]
> > > > diff -u -p a/drivers/net/au1000_eth.c b/drivers/net/au1000_eth.c
> > > > --- a/drivers/net/au1000_eth.c 2008-04-27 11:41:11.000000000 +0200
> > > > +++ b/drivers/net/au1000_eth.c 2008-05-12 09:32:54.000000000 +0200
> >>> @@ -1242,7 +1242,7 @@ static irqreturn_t au1000_interrupt(int
> > > > struct net_device *dev = (struct net_device *) dev_id;
> > > >
> > > > if (dev == NULL) {
> > > > - printk(KERN_ERR "%s: isr: null dev ptr\n", dev->name);
> > > > + printk(KERN_ERR "isr: null dev ptr\n");
> > > > return IRQ_RETVAL(1);
> > > > }
> > > The lifespan of 'dev' covers the request_irq..free_irq interval in this
> > > driver. The whole 'dev == NULL' block can be removed.
> >
> > Will you do that?
>
> It's normal within the Linux community to give feedback on patches, and
> sometimes the authors need to revise their patches if helpful feedback arises.
Sorry. In principle, I would be happy to do it, but I felt slightly
uneasy about doing something I didn't completely understand.
julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists