[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080512035643.GE2572@hacking>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 11:56:43 +0800
From: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, WANG Cong <wangcong@...ux.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch 7/9] fs/exec.c: fix wrong return value of
prepare_binprm()
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 08:31:05PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
>On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 09:52:32PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote:
>> All prepare_binprm()'s callers assume that prepare_binprm() fails
>> when it returns negative. However, prepare_binprm() most probably returns
>> the return value of kernel_read(), which may return positive on failure!
>>
>> Thus this should be fixed.
>
>Since when does read return positive on failure?
When an EIO occurs, I think. For example,
retval = kernel_read(interpreter, interp_elf_ex->e_phoff,
(char *)elf_phdata,size);
error = -EIO;
if (retval != size) {
if (retval < 0)
error = retval;
goto out_close;
}
--
Hi, I'm a .signature virus, please copy/paste me to help me spread
all over the world.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists