[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4828AEEC.2010705@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 22:56:12 +0200
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To: Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@...tkopp.net>
CC: Romano Giannetti <romanol@...omillas.es>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Kernel naming convention in the merge phase
Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> Romano Giannetti wrote:
>> What about a -rc0 as the first commit after a release? Will help a lot
>> automatic installing scripts...
What is "a lot"? Maybe the solution is to switch from sh to bash.
> Yes - this was also my intention. I don't have any preferences if the
> first commit after a release is named -merge or -rc0. But it should
> point out that we're leaving the former stable release.
2.6.25-git8 says exactly this. It is a nightly generated patch on top
of 2.6.25, retrieved from the then current linux-2.6.git.
If you see a -gitX then you know that this is not a release, it is only
a snapshot.
Your proposed -rc0 on the other hand has, in addition to the drawbacks
which H. Peter already mentioned, the problem that there would be
suddenly two release names for one and the same release. This would
only increase confusion.
Anyway. You can always add your own tags in your cloned repository.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- -=-= -==--
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists