lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080512.174152.123760440.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 12 May 2008 17:41:52 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paulus@...ba.org, mikpe@...uu.se
Subject: [PATCH 1/2]: lmb: Fix inconsistent alignment of size argument.


When allocating, if we will align up the size when making
the reservation, we should also align the size for the
check that the space is actually available.

The simplest thing is to just aling the size up from
the beginning, then we can use plain 'size' throughout.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
---
 lib/lmb.c |   12 ++++++++----
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/lmb.c b/lib/lmb.c
index 83287d3..93445dc 100644
--- a/lib/lmb.c
+++ b/lib/lmb.c
@@ -286,8 +286,7 @@ static u64 __init lmb_alloc_nid_unreserved(u64 start, u64 end,
 		j = lmb_overlaps_region(&lmb.reserved, base, size);
 		if (j < 0) {
 			/* this area isn't reserved, take it */
-			if (lmb_add_region(&lmb.reserved, base,
-					   lmb_align_up(size, align)) < 0)
+			if (lmb_add_region(&lmb.reserved, base, size) < 0)
 				base = ~(u64)0;
 			return base;
 		}
@@ -333,6 +332,10 @@ u64 __init lmb_alloc_nid(u64 size, u64 align, int nid,
 	struct lmb_region *mem = &lmb.memory;
 	int i;
 
+	BUG_ON(0 == size);
+
+	size = lmb_align_up(size, align);
+
 	for (i = 0; i < mem->cnt; i++) {
 		u64 ret = lmb_alloc_nid_region(&mem->region[i],
 					       nid_range,
@@ -370,6 +373,8 @@ u64 __init __lmb_alloc_base(u64 size, u64 align, u64 max_addr)
 
 	BUG_ON(0 == size);
 
+	size = lmb_align_up(size, align);
+
 	/* On some platforms, make sure we allocate lowmem */
 	/* Note that LMB_REAL_LIMIT may be LMB_ALLOC_ANYWHERE */
 	if (max_addr == LMB_ALLOC_ANYWHERE)
@@ -393,8 +398,7 @@ u64 __init __lmb_alloc_base(u64 size, u64 align, u64 max_addr)
 			j = lmb_overlaps_region(&lmb.reserved, base, size);
 			if (j < 0) {
 				/* this area isn't reserved, take it */
-				if (lmb_add_region(&lmb.reserved, base,
-						   lmb_align_up(size, align)) < 0)
+				if (lmb_add_region(&lmb.reserved, base, size) < 0)
 					return 0;
 				return base;
 			}
-- 
1.5.5.1.57.g5909c

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ