linux-kernel - Re: Unneeded kernel threads (xfs, jfs, gfs2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <482952F2.3080608@unixsol.org>
Date:	Tue, 13 May 2008 11:36:02 +0300
From:	Georgi Chorbadzhiyski <gf@...xsol.org>
To:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
CC:	xfs@....sgi.com, jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	cluster-devel@...hat.com,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Unneeded kernel threads (xfs, jfs, gfs2)

Jan Engelhardt mumbled something about, On 5/13/08 2:21 AM:
> On Tuesday 2008-05-13 00:55, Georgi Chorbadzhiyski wrote:
>> Not needed here, because no jfs partition is in use.
>> Not needed here, because no xfs partition is in use.
>> I dont use gfs2
> 
> You miss the best of Linux. So, why not unload the modules?

ext3 is working just fine for now, thanks (:

>>>  1141 ?        S<     0:00  \_ [block-osm/1]
>> What is osm? Can't find anything in kernel config?
> 
> drivers/message/i2o/i2o_block.c:#define OSM_NAME        "block-osm"
> 
>>>  1148 ?        S<     0:00  \_ [khpsbpkt]
>> What is this?
> 
> ieee1394/ieee1394_core.c:static struct task_struct *khpsbpkt_thread;

Strange names :)

-- 
Georgi Chorbadzhiyski
http://georgi.unixsol.org/

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/