[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080513223340.de2bb4a4.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 22:33:40 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@...eus.cx>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, Steven French <sfrench@...ibm.com>,
Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>,
Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>, Jan Kara <jack@....cz>,
Anton Vorontsov <cbou@...l.ru>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
Christian Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@....org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Erez Zadok <ezk@...sunysb.edu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next
Hi Pierre,
On Tue, 13 May 2008 12:47:45 +0200 Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@...eus.cx> wrote:
>
> That's correct. But I've always made sure that for-linus is the base for
> for-andrew (now next), so that should not be necessary.
What it allows me to do, though, is drop your "next" tree if things go
really bad without dropping fixes for Linus' current tree that you deem
necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists