[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080513091101.0448bbba@bree.surriel.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 09:11:01 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: lee.schermerhorn@...com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 05/15] free swap space on swap-in/activation
On Tue, 13 May 2008 22:00:44 +0900
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp> wrote:
> On 2008/05/12 22:33 +0900, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 May 2008 20:21:32 +0900
> > Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp> wrote:
> >
> >> So, the intention of this patch is
> >> not to free a swap space of swap cache that has already swapped in
> >> and only used one process as do_swap_page() does,
> >> but to free a swap space that is only used as a swap cache
> >> (not used by any processes), right?
> >
> > No. The code should also free the swap space of pages that are
> > mapped by processes, in order to free up swap space for other
> > uses. This only happens if vm_swap_full() is true.
> >
>
> OK.
>
> I thought that current code cannot free the swap space
> of pages that are mapped by processes(and I think it cannot),
> so I asked the intention of this patch for clarification.
You may be right, due to the refcounting magic that is going
on. I will verify the code and send in a fix if it turns out
to be needed.
--
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists