lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080513082313.cbbe81af.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 13 May 2008 08:23:13 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Cc:	Gianni Tedesco <gxt@...nott.ac.uk>, arges@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	Maynard Johnson <maynardj@...ibm.com>,
	Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, oprofile-list@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: oprofile BUG() in current kernel.

On Tue, 13 May 2008 12:25:26 +0200 Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com> wrote:

> Current module loader only allocates percpu room by examining 
> ".data.percpu" section and should be augmented to also look at 
> ".data.percpu.shared_aligned"
> Or, change DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED() for modules (to use 
> ".data.percpu" only)

Well that's a little landmine.  Seems that this was the first attempt to
use DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED from within a module.

> Anyway, with the per_cpu conversion of cpu_buffer, we dont need to 
> request cache_line alignment anymore
>
> [PATCH] oprofile: Dont request cache line alignment for cpu_buffer

Thanks.  Silly me for looking at the nearly-one-year-old
DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED and assuming that it worked :(


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ