lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 13 May 2008 10:22:17 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
	Sven Wegener <sven.wegener@...aler.net>,
	"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes



On Tue, 13 May 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> hm, this sounds like damage that is inflicted on itself by the XFS code. 

No. You're confusing what a counting semaphore is.

> Why does it signal to its waiters that "resource is available", when in 
> reality that resource is not available but immediately serialized via a 
> lock? (even if the lock might technically be some _other_ object)

So you have 'n' resources available, and you use a counting semaphore for 
that resource counting.

But you'd still need a spinlock to actually protect the list of resources 
themselves. The spinlock protects a different thing than the semaphore. 
The semaphore isn't about mutual exclusion - it's about counting resources 
and waiting when there are too many things in flight.

And you seem to think that a counting semaphore is about mutual exclusion. 
It has nothing what-so-ever to do with that. 

			Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ