[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080513180509.GB4077@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 11:05:09 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>, stable@...nel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dm.n9107@...il.com
Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH] file descriptor leak in sys_pipe
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 07:34:25PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 5 May 2008 05:21:57 -0400 Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > DM <dm.n9107@...il.com> wrote:
> > > I realize this code is old, but wouldn't file descriptors leak if
> > > copy_to_user fails?
> >
> > I think you're right. The following should patch it for the remaining
> > C implementations which need that kind of patch.
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/cris/kernel/sys_cris.c b/arch/cris/kernel/sys_cris.c
> > index 8b99841..d124066 100644
> > --- a/arch/cris/kernel/sys_cris.c
> > +++ b/arch/cris/kernel/sys_cris.c
> > @@ -40,8 +40,11 @@ asmlinkage int sys_pipe(unsigned long __user * fildes)
> > error = do_pipe(fd);
> > unlock_kernel();
> > if (!error) {
> > - if (copy_to_user(fildes, fd, 2*sizeof(int)))
> > + if (copy_to_user(fildes, fd, 2*sizeof(int))) {
> > + sys_close(fd[0]);
> > + sys_close(fd[1]);
> > error = -EFAULT;
> > + }
> > }
> > return error;
> > }
> > diff --git a/arch/m32r/kernel/sys_m32r.c b/arch/m32r/kernel/sys_m32r.c
> > index 6d7a80f..319c797 100644
> > --- a/arch/m32r/kernel/sys_m32r.c
> > +++ b/arch/m32r/kernel/sys_m32r.c
> > @@ -90,8 +90,11 @@ sys_pipe(unsigned long r0, unsigned long r1, unsigned long r2,
> >
> > error = do_pipe(fd);
> > if (!error) {
> > - if (copy_to_user((void __user *)r0, fd, 2*sizeof(int)))
> > + if (copy_to_user((void __user *)r0, fd, 2*sizeof(int))) {
> > + sys_close(fd[0]);
> > + sys_close(fd[1]);
> > error = -EFAULT;
> > + }
> > }
> > return error;
> > }
> > diff --git a/fs/pipe.c b/fs/pipe.c
> > index 3499f9f..ec228bc 100644
> > --- a/fs/pipe.c
> > +++ b/fs/pipe.c
> > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> > #include <linux/highmem.h>
> > #include <linux/pagemap.h>
> > #include <linux/audit.h>
> > +#include <linux/syscalls.h>
> >
> > #include <asm/uaccess.h>
> > #include <asm/ioctls.h>
> > @@ -1086,8 +1087,11 @@ asmlinkage long __weak sys_pipe(int __user *fildes)
> >
> > error = do_pipe(fd);
> > if (!error) {
> > - if (copy_to_user(fildes, fd, sizeof(fd)))
> > + if (copy_to_user(fildes, fd, sizeof(fd))) {
> > + sys_close(fd[0]);
> > + sys_close(fd[1]);
> > error = -EFAULT;
> > + }
> > }
> > return error;
> > }
>
> OK.
>
> Unfortunately the sys_pipe() code has changed a lot since 2.6.25 so if we
> wish to backport this fix into earlier kernels, it will need to be largely
> reimplemented.
>
> What are the implications of the bug? An errant applicaiton can exhaust
> its own fd table and eventually won't be able to open more files. This
> gets fixed up when the application exits. I don't think there are any
> worse implications?
>
> In which case 2.6.25.x and earlier can perhaps live without the fix.
As the code is so different in 2.6.25.x, I can't see how to apply this
fix there, so I'll just not worry about it for now.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists