lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080513181834.GA29133@linuxtv.org>
Date:	Tue, 13 May 2008 20:18:34 +0200
From:	Johannes Stezenbach <js@...uxtv.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Oliver Endriss <o.endriss@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
	Andrew de Quincey <adq_dvb@...skialf.net>
Subject: Re: [patch, 2.6.26-rc2] dvb: drivers/media/dvb/ttpci/fdump
	firmware build error fix

On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 06:42:38PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Johannes Stezenbach <js@...uxtv.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 04:33:54PM +0200, Oliver Endriss wrote:
> > > Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
> > > > You can put PREVENT_FIRMWARE_BUILD=y in your allrandom.config.
> > > 
> > > Sure. And without the patch you can simply add
> > > - STANDALONE=y or
> > > - DVB_AV7110_FIRMWARE=n
> > > to your allrandom.config. ;-)
> > 
> > It is desirable to have one generic "don't break the build because of 
> > missing firmware binaries" option, isn't it?
> 
> it's a bit confusing. PREVENT_FIRMWARE_BUILD=y is the 'weaker' option - 
> a driver might still be operational (with its default firmware), even if 
> no firmware is built. STANDALONE=y is the stronger option - if a driver 
> depends on that it means that the driver cannot be built (and used) at 
> all without a firmware file. To be on the safe side users who have no 
> firmware needs should set both options. (and that's the default as well)

Seems like I'm confused now...

  CONFIG_STANDALONE
    Prompt: Select only drivers that don't need compile-time external firmware

  PREVENT_FIRMWARE_BUILD
    Prompt: Prevent firmware from being built

I guess selecting either one should prevent the build issue
you got, so your patch is right. But I also was wrong on
the meaning of STANDALONE...
Now I wonder why PREVENT_FIRMWARE_BUILD exists at all.


Johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ