[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080513190024.GB6465@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 21:00:24 +0200
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [BUG] cpu hotplug vs scheduler
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 06:33:00PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>> I'm testing host cpu hotplug with kvm. Basically running 7 guests on
>> a 4 core machine, offlining and onlining host cpus at random.
>> Eventually I hit this:
>>
>
> [snip oops]
>
>> This seems to be the assignment to cfs_rq after pick_next_entity().
>>
>> I'm running kvm.git, which is currently 2.6.26-rc2 plus a few kvm
>> patches. It could be kvm's fault, but it doesn't appear so from the
>> traces.
>>
>
> I get the same oops running with the kvm modules unloaded. None of
> kvm.git's changes are in core code, so this is definitely a mainline
> problem.
>
> It took about 40 minutes to reproduce; 1200 cpus onlined and 1200 cpus
> offlined.
FWIW, this happens on s390 as well (without kvm support). But until now
I didn't have time to look into it. Didn't report it here yet, since we
had plenty of cpu hotplug changes in arch code, so I suspected a bug there.
This doesn't seem to be the case.
It takes only a few minutes to trigger the bug here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists