[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1210711451.21217.55.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 13:44:11 -0700
From: Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>
To: menage@...gle.com
Cc: pj@....com, xemul@...nvz.org, balbir@...ibm.com, serue@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/8]: CGroup Files: Add a cgroup write_string
control file method
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 23:37 -0700, menage@...gle.com wrote:
> plain text document attachment (cgroup_write_string.patch)
> This patch adds a write_string() method for cgroups control files. The
> semantics are that a buffer is copied from userspace to kernelspace
> and the handler function invoked on that buffer. Any control group
> locking is done after the copy from userspace has occurred. The buffer
> is guaranteed to be nul-terminated, and no longer than max_write_len
> (defaulting to 64 bytes if unspecified). Later patches will convert
> existing raw file write handlers in control group subsystems to use
> this method.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
I haven't looked at this very thoroughly but I think the goal of this
patch is good. Can't this patch and the conversions precede your locking
changes?
Cheers,
-Matt Helsley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists