[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <003201c8b53c$67ff02d0$6400a8c0@bui.materna.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 23:00:42 +0200
From: "Roland" <devzero@....de>
To: <tvrtko@...ulin.net>, <pernegger@...il.com>, <snitzer@...il.com>,
<jengelh@...putergmbh.de>, <zorglub_olsen@...mail.com>,
<renatoyamane@...dic.com.br>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: WD doesn`t use disks with Linux - was Re: Re:Western Digital GreenPower drives and Linux
>BTW, WD's tech support has gone silent so chances for an easier solution
>are not so great.
>
>Tvrtko
I`ve got a real funky response from WD support today, i`d like to share
here.
This is just too weird....
After asking if they could give a comment if the problem with the high
Load_Cycle_Count may be an issue of their drives or an issue of Linux i got:
------
Dear......
The problem is, that we actually don`t use the disks with Linux. I´m sorry
that i cannot send further information to you.
Sincery yours
<insert support employee name here>
Western Digital Service and Support
------
(translated from german)
So, WD sells enterprise SATA disks, optimizied for 24/7 & Raid array usage,
but they don`t seem to actually test them with Linux or at least are not
able to "support" Linux usage.......
Ridicuous!
> List: linux-kernel
> Subject: Western Digital GreenPower drives and Linux
> From: "Tvrtko A. Ursulin" <tvrtko () ursulin ! net>
> Date: 2008-04-09 20:18:35
> Message-ID: 200804092118.35501.tvrtko () ursulin ! net
> [Download message RAW]
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> The subject may be a bit misleading since I haven't investigated the whole
> issue under other OS-es (nor do I plan to), but this is how the story
> goes..
>
> Those fancy new WD GreenPower drives seem to be heavily suffering from the
> rapidly increasing head load/unload problem. And the bad thing is they
> don't
> respond to 'hdparm -B', which would mean (I think) their power management
> behaviour is solely up to their firmware.
>
> I got one of them (WD5000AACS) recently and to my horror after less than
> three
> days of being power on this is what I saw:
>
> 9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 66
> 193 Load_Cycle_Count 0x0032 197 197 000 Old_age Always - 10233
>
> At this rate the disk would reach it's design limit for load/unload cycles
> in
> around 80 days. Not good - so I implemented a lame workaround of keeping
> disk
> busy every couple of seconds - hopefully that won't kill it sooner that
> unloads would..
>
> I am also currently talking with first line of WD's tech support trying to
> get
> some data on how exactly those drives manage head unloading, but that may
> not
> lead anywhere useful.
>
> So in parallel I decided to ask here to see if someone knows something
> about
> this?
>
> If it matters, I am running vanilla 2.6.24 on that box and sata_sil is
> driving
> that disk. Otherwise it is a pretty basic Ubuntu 7.10, a mix of ext3 and
> jfs
> filesystems, all mounted with noatime. More detailed information available
> on
> request.
>
> Tvrtko
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists