[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <482A0254.1020100@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 23:04:20 +0200
From: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
To: daniel.ritz@....ch
CC: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH ?] pcmcia: ti113x: fix ENE_TEST_C9_PFENABLE definition
This code was added in commit 8c3520d4eb3b1bbf2e45fbae8dcfb8db06d5e775
Is the replacement below correct, or should the second ENE_TEST_C9_PFENABLE_F0
be removed? The patch below assumes the former is correct.
---
Fix ENE_TEST_C9_PFENABLE definition.
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
---
diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/ti113x.h b/drivers/pcmcia/ti113x.h
index d29657b..87a5fd5 100644
--- a/drivers/pcmcia/ti113x.h
+++ b/drivers/pcmcia/ti113x.h
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
#define ENE_TEST_C9_TLTENABLE 0x02
#define ENE_TEST_C9_PFENABLE_F0 0x04
#define ENE_TEST_C9_PFENABLE_F1 0x08
-#define ENE_TEST_C9_PFENABLE (ENE_TEST_C9_PFENABLE_F0 | ENE_TEST_C9_PFENABLE_F0)
+#define ENE_TEST_C9_PFENABLE (ENE_TEST_C9_PFENABLE_F0 | ENE_TEST_C9_PFENABLE_F1)
#define ENE_TEST_C9_WPDISALBLE_F0 0x40
#define ENE_TEST_C9_WPDISALBLE_F1 0x80
#define ENE_TEST_C9_WPDISALBLE (ENE_TEST_C9_WPDISALBLE_F0 | ENE_TEST_C9_WPDISALBLE_F1)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists