[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <482AC60D.8020207@hp.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 06:59:25 -0400
From: Mark Seger <Mark.Seger@...com>
To: Shailabh Nagar <nagar@...son.ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>, Jes Sorensen <jes@....com>,
Chris Sturtivant <csturtiv@....com>, Tony Ernst <tee@....com>,
Guillaume Thouvenin <guillaume.thouvenin@...l.net>,
Jay Lan <jlan@...r.sgi.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: taskstats and /proc/.../io asymmetry?
If you look at /proc/pid/stat, you can get the total CPU consumed by a
process. If you look at /proc/pid/task/tid/stat you can get the cpu
consumed by a thread and if the tid is that of the parent you only gets
its consumption as opposed to all its children.
I was surprised to see that the way process I/O is reported doesn't
follow this model. There are no /prod/pid/task/tid/io entries but
rather you need to look in /proc/tid/io. While I view this as a minor
inconvenience, I can certainly live with it. However, /proc/pid/io does
not show the aggregate I/O numbers for the whole process and that both
surprises and disappoints. This means if I have a process that starts a
bunch of worker threads that do the real work and I want to find the top
I/O consumers I can't simply walk the /proc/pid tree but rather have to
look at all the threads of each process and add them up.
Or am I missing something?
-mark
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists