[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0805140638450.14334@cobra.newdream.net>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 06:41:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: Sage Weil <sage@...dream.net>
To: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: POHMELFS high performance network filesystem. Transactions,
failover, performance.
> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 11:40:28AM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov (johnpol@....mipt.ru) wrote:
> > > If any thread takes more than one kmap() at a time, it is deadlockable.
> > > Because there is a finite pool of kmaps. Everyone can end up holding
> > > one or more kmaps, then waiting for someone else to release one.
> >
> > It never takes the whole LAST_PKMAP maps. So the same can be applied to
> > any user who kmaps at least one page - while user waits for free slot,
> > it can be reused by someone else and so on.
>
> Actually CIFS uses the same logic: maps multiple pages in wrteback path
> and release them after received reply.
Yes. Only a pagevec at a time, though... apparently 14 is a small enough
number not to bite too many people in practice?
sage
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists