linux-kernel - Re: volanoMark regression with kernel 2.6.26-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1210776633.5781.12.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date:	Wed, 14 May 2008 16:50:33 +0200
From:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To:	vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
	Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Aneesh Kumar KV <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: volanoMark regression with kernel 2.6.26-rc1


On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 19:14 +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:20:47AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > It looks like things like find_busiest_group() just think everything is
> > peachy when the imbalance is < 1 task - which with all this grouping
> > stuff is not necessarily true.
> 
> fwiw, the following hack seems to help bring down regression to ~5%
> (b/n 2.6.25 and 2.6.26-rc1 with USER_SCHED):
> 
> Also in the patch GROUP_SCALE can probably be less than what I used (and
> needs a ifdef GROUP_SCHED) ..

On my little Q6600 with git.today, it made no real difference, whether
NORMALIZED_SLEEPERS was enabled or not.  I see roughly 10-15% idle time
w/wo this patch, whereas pre-regression, it's < 2%.

	-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/