linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] [mm] buddy page allocator: add tunable big order allocation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <386072610805132122l5d017fe1u404c38ea3f05664a@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 14 May 2008 12:22:35 +0800
From:	"Bryan Wu" <cooloney@...nel.org>
To:	"Hennerich, Michael" <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>
Cc:	"KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki" <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	dwmw2@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] [mm] buddy page allocator: add tunable big order allocation

On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 7:42 PM, Hennerich, Michael
<Michael.Hennerich@...log.com> wrote:
>
>
>  >-----Original Message-----
>  >From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [mailto:kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com]
>  >Sent: Dienstag, 13. Mai 2008 04:09
>  >To: Bryan Wu
>  >Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-mm@...ck.org;
>  dwmw2@...radead.org;
>  >Michael Hennerich
>  >Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] [mm] buddy page allocator: add tunable big
>  order
>  >allocation
>  >
>  >On Mon, 12 May 2008 18:32:02 +0800
>  >Bryan Wu <cooloney@...nel.org> wrote:
>  >
>  >> From: Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>
>  >>
>  >> Signed-off-by: Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>
>  >> Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <cooloney@...nel.org>
>  >
>  >Does this really solve your problem ? possible hang-up is better than
>  >page allocation failure ?
>
>  On nommu this helped quite a bit, when we run out of memory, eaten up by
>  the page cache. But yes - with this option it's likely that we sit there
>  and wait form memory that might never get available.
>
>  We now use a better workaround for freeing up "available" memory
>  currently used as page cache.
>
>  I think we should drop this patch.
>

OK, I dropped it. And do you think the limited page_cache patch is the
replacement of this patch?

-Bryan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/