[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080514214347.GD23758@shareable.org>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 22:43:49 +0100
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>,
Sage Weil <sage@...dream.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: POHMELFS high performance network filesystem. Transactions, failover, performance.
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Definitely. "several leaders" aka partitioning is also becoming
> increasing paired with efforts at enhancing locality of reference. Both
> Google and Amazon sort their distributed tables lexographically, which
> [ideally] results in similar data being stored near each other.
>
> A bit of an improvement over partitioning-by-hash, anyway, for some
> workloads.
As with B-trees on disks, and in-memory structures, application
knowledge of locality is very much worth passing to the storage layer.
-- Jamie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists