[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7207.1210802867@vena.lwn.net>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 16:07:47 -0600
From: corbet@....net (Jonathan Corbet)
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Alexander Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [announce] "kill the Big Kernel Lock (BKL)" tree
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> I don't think there are *that* many. I found only 83 instances of
> "register_chrdev()" in the kernel, so the open methods should be pretty
> limited.
There's the drivers calling cdev_add() directly as well - another
40ish. Still not a huge list, I guess.
> So it literally should be:
> - remove one lock_kernel/unlock_kernel pair in fs/char_dev.c
> - add max 83 pairs in the places that register those things
> - external modules will need to add it themselves some day.
This is all certainly doable, but it leaves me with one concern: there
will be no signal to external module maintainers that the change needs
to be made. So, beyond doubt, quite a few of them will just continue to
be shipped unfixed - and they will still run. If any of them actually
*need* the BKL, something awful may happen to somebody someday.
jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists