linux-kernel - Re: POHMELFS high performance network filesystem. Transactions, failover, performance.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080514224519.GA3739@2ka.mipt.ru>
Date:	Thu, 15 May 2008 02:45:19 +0400
From:	Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
To:	Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>
Cc:	Sage Weil <sage@...dream.net>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: POHMELFS high performance network filesystem. Transactions, failover, performance.

On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 11:28:37PM +0100, Jamie Lokier (jamie@...reable.org) wrote:
> I think that's a fine choice, but it doesn't solve difficult
> problems.  You still have to implement the server cloud. :-)

If that would not be dificult problem, it would not be interesting at
all :)

> It's possible that implementing server cloud protocol _and_ simple
> client protocol may be more work than just server cloud protocol.  I'm
> not sure.  Thoughts welcome.

Well, getting that client protocol is mostly ready, and its design
allows infinite (blah!) extensions and extremely (blah!) flexible
processing, we are close to just difficult server one :)

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/