[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <482C5281.7020306@firstfloor.org>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 17:10:57 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: John Stoffel <john@...ffel.org>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Alexander Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [announce] "kill the Big Kernel Lock (BKL)" tree
John Stoffel wrote:
>>>>>> "Andi" == Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> writes:
>
> Andi> Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>> On Thu, 15 May 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
>>>> The goal less being to get rid of BKL in old drivers, but not
>>>> requiring BKL in new drivers. Basically all BKL assumptions
>>>> in interfaces really should go.
>>> No, we really do want to get rid of BKL in old drivers too. Or at least in
>>> the interfaces.
>
> Andi> In the interfaces definitely yes and all subsystems should have
> Andi> their own lock_kernel calls, but why in the old drivers? For
> Andi> those it's very unlikely they are used on any SMP system anyways
> Andi> (e.g. anything depending on CONFIG_ISA) or if they do only on 2
> Andi> CPU systems.
>
> I'm still running an SMP server with ISA slots.
I do too (although one CPU has died recently), but how many ISA devices
do you use in it? Mine used to have a ISA ISDN card, but that was it
and then no ISA anymore even though the slots are still in there.
Also on 2 CPU systems BKL is not that critical anyways. It only starts
to hurt on larger CPU counts.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists