[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <482C854C.7070405@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 11:47:40 -0700
From: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
CC: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Chris Peterson <cpeterso@...terso.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/net: remove network drivers' last few uses of
IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Alan Cox wrote:
>>> In short, I agree with Alan's IRQF_SAMPLE_DUBIOUS, and know of Linux
>>> customers who also want the same.
>>
>> They should be made to read the Debian ssh security report - three times
>> and understand the same would apply to them if something did cause their
>> network packet arrivals to be observed or non-random
>>
>> Far better would be to get your CPU guys to put an RNG back into the
>> systems or on the CPU die ala VIA. Given I've even seen people using VIA
>> boxes as a random number feeder (streaming random numbers over SSL) there
>> is clearly a demand 8)
>
> The Treacherous Platform Module includes an RNG.
>
> Someone (hi Jesse?) should implement support for TPM_GetRandom.
Sounds like something he should neither use in the e1000 driver nor implement :)
This would be an interesting thing to the generic rng support in linux though
Auke
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists