linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86: per-device dma_mapping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 15 May 2008 23:03:40 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@...ibm.com>
Cc:	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
	andi@...stfloor.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alexisb@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86: per-device dma_mapping_ops

On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 06:26:31PM +0300, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 06:41:26PM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> 
> > I thought that KVM people want to do it per device (in the first
> > case). So with my patchse, they can replace the dma_ops pointer in
> > dev_archdata with what they want.
> 
> That's my understanding too. We use stackable ops as a poor man's
> replacement for per-device ops (depending on what kind of device it
> is, call the original ops or our pvdma ops).

But in the KVM case you still need to support the underlying ops too, e.g. in 
case of bouncing through swiotlb needed

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/