[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080515220526.GH10434@il.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 01:05:26 +0300
From: Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@...ibm.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alexisb@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86: per-device dma_mapping_ops
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:53:15AM +0300, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 11:45:10PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > Even rare cases need to be handled.
>
> Sure, but I'd rather we handle the common case first.
... which is not to say of course we can't do both, dev_archdata could
have a list of struct dma_mapping_ops instead of (or in addition to) a
struct dma_mapping_ops pointer. If space was at a premium we could
even multiplex both on the same pointer by using one of the low bits
to select between them.
Cheers,
Muli
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists