[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080515222741.GQ18825@mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 18:27:41 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Chris Peterson <cpeterso@...terso.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mpm@...enic.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/net: remove network drivers' last few uses of
IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 06:04:04PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> I have seen embedded systems with zero entropy, and dubious entropy might
>> there be better than no entropy at all.
>> Or am I wrong on the latter?
>
> It's also relevant to the discussion to note that input data to kernel
> devrandom is mixed, and we can control the amount of "credit" applied to
> incoming entropy.
Sure, and one possible thing to do is to simply always input the
interrupt information to the random number generator, but give it a
"entropy credit" of 0. That has the net result of potentially
improving the entropy found in /dev/random and /dev/urandom, but not
necessarily compromising /dev/random, since /dev/random's output is
throttled by the entropy estimate.
The only cost of doing this would be the overhead in sending the
information into the entropy pool.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists