[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <482CBC3E.8060305@garzik.org>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 18:42:06 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
CC: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Chris Peterson <cpeterso@...terso.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/net: remove network drivers' last few uses of
IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM
Brandeburg, Jesse wrote:
> we've been hearing rumblings of big customers wanting (maybe requiring)
> wired network drivers from Intel to advertise this flag. Jeff have you
> heard of such?
>
> I think the argument is that a headless system (no keyboard/mouse, no
> soundcard, probably no video) with a libata based driver and a network
> driver without IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM has *no* sources of entropy. In this
> case the argument is very strong for at least *some* source of entropy
> from interrupts so that randomness can get some external input. Just
> try rebuilding a kernel RPM over an ssh session and you'll see what I
> mean.
>
> In short, I agree with Alan's IRQF_SAMPLE_DUBIOUS, and know of Linux
> customers who also want the same.
So I guess a good message for customers might be:
Don't depend on an entropy source whose volume decreases as workload and
network traffic increase.
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists