[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1210830110.23707.141.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 13:41:50 +0800
From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
CC: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, nigel@...el.suspend2.net,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Kexec Mailing List <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] kexec jump -v9
Hi, Vivek,
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 16:52 -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
[...]
> Ok, I have done some testing on this patch. Currently I have just
> tested switching back and forth between two kernels and it is working for
> me.
>
> Just that I had to put LAPIC and IOAPIC in legacy mode for it to work. Few
> comments/questions are inline.
It seems that for LAPIC and IOAPIC, there is
lapic_suspend()/lapic_resume() and ioapic_suspend()/ioapic_resume(),
which will be called before/after kexec jump through
device_power_down()/device_power_up(). So, the mechanism for
LAPIC/IOAPIC is there, we may need to check the corresponding
implementation.
Best Regards,
Huang Ying
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists