[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080516121836.GE22264@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 14:18:36 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>, nigel@...el.suspend2.net,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Kexec Mailing List <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] kexec jump -v9
On Thu 2008-05-15 15:03:17, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> writes:
>
> > Well, it looks like we do similar things concurrently. Please have a look
> > here: http://kerneltrap.org/Linux/Separating_Suspend_and_Hibernation
>
> Yes. Part of the reason I wanted to separate these two conversations
> I knew something was going on.
>
> > Similar patches are in the Greg's tree already.
>
> Taking a look.
>
> I just can't get past the fact in that the only reason hibernation can
> not use the widely implemented and tested probe/remove is because of
> filesystems on block devices, and that you are proposing to add 4
> methods for each and every driver to handle that case, when they
> don't need ANYTHING!
>
> I wonder how hard teaching the upper layers to deal with
> hotplug/remove is?
It looked _too_ hard when I was looking... at least if we are thinking
off "keep the filesystem mounted over unplug-replug".
Or do you have something else in mind?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists