[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805151844440.2941@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 18:47:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: gorcunov@...il.com, geert@...ux-m68k.org, zippel@...ux-m68k.org,
schwab@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] init - fix building bug and potential buffer overflow
On Thu, 15 May 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> this, basically:
>
> > init/main.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
> > 1 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> the dont-mix-bugfixes-and-cleanups mantra.
Sure. I committed them as two separate things.
The point *I* had was that we don't make source code uglier for arbitrary
reasons. The checkpatch.pl script shouldn't be powerful enough that we do
uglier source code and break arbitrary rules just to make that script
happy.
So either we should sy "screw the script, it's wrong", or we should just
not fix the bug. Or we should say "ok, I can write even _better_ source
code, and fix the bug, make the source look nicer _and_ not piss off the
script too".
> > Would somebody please want to move that cast into the macro (or better
> > yet, make it an inline function that takes a 'void *'), and remove all the
> > casts from the callers?
>
> Would be nice.
So I did that too.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists